About Ruadhán McElroy

Ruadhán J McElroy is a novelist, singer, and Mod revival & Ska DJ living in Lansing, Michigan. He is building the Kardia tou Thespiae garden at his home, soon to be available, by appointment, to all who worship Eros.

Ornithomancy

Divination by birds.

Author: * Jonus Hasdrubal
Date: Dec 8, 2003 – 19:44

Birds have always held a fascination for men, whether they are good or bad omens. Augur, which is another word for omen, comes from the Latin ‘augurium’ or, literally, ‘divinatory observation of birds’, which gave augur the meaning, ‘priest who provides favourable omens’.

Initially, the messages, predictions and divinations delivered by the augurs were systematically good. The word ‘august’ which means now ‘imposing and worthy of respect’ came to mean, in those days, ‘sanctioned by the augur’ in other words promised success by the gods.

From the word ‘august’ came the origin of our month of August, and the Christian name Augustus. Subsequently, ‘augur’ was to take on the meaning of good or bad prediction. But before that, the augur could only be good.

Although the Roman priests were great and renowned soothsayers, paying particular attention to the signs revealed by birds, the divinatory arts made up from compilations of omens relating to birds were in common use and highly prized by the Egyptians, Chaldeans, Greeks, Celts, Gauls, Indians, Arabs and Chinese. In Greece this divinatory art took the name of ornithomancy, that is, divination by birds. But it was in Rome that each of the gods was awarded a protecting bird: the eagle to Jupiter, the dove to Venus, the owl to Minerva, etc.

The bird as a reflection of the soul.

It is true that very early on the bird represented in men’s minds the most precious and important thing in him; his soul! Also, any man who, in the eyes of his fellow creatures, was divine or supernatural often had the power to talk to the birds, and these used to come to him as if he were one of them That is why someone who can talk to the birds and understand their song is a symbolic representation of the man who has succeeded in taming his soul, often depicted as a snake or bird which you cannot catch. Merlin, the sorcerer, and St. Francis of Assisi, for example, lived amongst the birds and seemed to understand their language and converse with them.

With regard to the relationship and associations which exist between the bird and the snake, in the world of myths and symbols of Antiquity, there is the Greek legend of Cassandra and her brother Helenus, she became a prophetess and he became a seer, that is, a visionary and a soothsayer, after some snakes had licked their eyes and ears while they were asleep. Another Greek legend, in similar vein, tells us how the visionary Melampus, having had his ears licked by the snakes which he had reared himself, could hear and understand the universal language, that is to say, the language of symbols, which was often likened to the songs of birds.

From then on, it really did seem that the relationship or relation between the snake and bird was established, if not scientifically, then at least intuitively and metaphorically, by our ancestors who had a liking for omens and knew how to detect the mysterious links between different forms or revelations of nature. Nowadays palaeontologists are inclined to think that birds could be the descendants of certain kinds of carnivorous dinosaurs. Recently, in an area north of Peking, the fossil of a carnivorous dinosaur with feathers, christened Sinosauropteryx, was discovered. Expert palaeontologists did not consider it to be the direct ancestor of the bird, but they saw enough similarities to reveal a likely connection between the huge reptile and the bird.

Read the rest here.

Anita Lane – “The Next Man That I See”

[click for video —embedding disabled for some reason]

What you did was wrong
You had a boat rocking to a sad sad song
Wind through the flowers and words fall apart
But there is the Divine in all things
In my broken house,
my broken plates,
my broken fingernails
That’s a part of god, too

And I think that I’ll just
Make Love
To the next man that I see
The next man that I see
And I think that I’ll just..

You’re not here
That’s my atmosphere
I am a scream to the two teams
I long to leave my body
And stalk your dreams
And go and do my master work

The thinking of you
The creation of you
And who you’ll be
And how you will complete me

But I am
As I am
As I am
As I am

But I think that I’ll just
Make Love
To the next man that I see
The next man that I see
And I think that I’ll just…

All these broken things
They’re a part of god too
There is the divine in all that you feel
and all that you do
and I think I’ll just go and do what I do
and play in your memories

The thinking of you
the creation of you
and who you will be
and how you will complete me

But I am
As I am
As I am
As I am

And I think that I’ll just
Make love
To the next man that I see
The next man that I see
And I think that I’ll just…

Yeah I think that I’ll just
Make love….

And I think that I’ll just
Make love
To the next man that I see
The next man that I see
And I think that I’ll just…

Yeah I think that I’ll just
Make love….

(transcribed by hand from listening; I cannot find a comprehensive lyrics page for Ms Lane’s work anywhere)

Anita Lane

If you think her work sounds very Nick Cave-y, there’s a reason for that: She dated him for a while during his early Boys Next Door/The Birthday Party days, and she actually co-wrote a few of his songs.

Despite her clear talent and influence, the reason you’ve probably never heard of her is cos (word on the street, anyway) is that she’s got such intense stage fright that she barely made it through the few times friends have managed to convince her to perform live.

Oberon Zell Ravenheart interview: Challenges of Polyamory

5:24 …and there are people who are serial monogamists, I’ve known people who are deeply committed to the principles of polyamory on paper, they’ve read all the books, and they fall in love with one person and then immediately they lose for the person they’ve been with, and they don’t like it, they’re unhappy, and they don’t understand it, they wish it wasn’t that way, but they just can’t get it up for that other person anymore, because something about the way their pheremones are hooked up, their wiring is made, when their focus shifts to another, it turns off for that other person, it can only be on one at a time. And I suspect that serial monogamy may be the most common and fundamental pattern among people…


Originally, I’d planned to just VENT about a certain air of self-righteousness I see amongst polyamorists, and how they paint us monogamists in a negative light. We’re somehow all selfish, jealous, make all these unrealistic emotional demands upon our lovers, and (especially if we’re Pagan/Polytheists, to boot) we’re only monogamous because of Monotheistic (and/or Patriarchal) indoctrination —even when that cannot be further from the truth, for many people1, don’t'cha know? I could vent, but I think a couple of lines of dry cynicism is better.

I take comfort, though, in knowing that some-one considered so integral to the polyamory movement, especially as it exists in the pagan community, is completely OK with people who love my way, and even suggests that it might be the human default, and that that’s OK, there’s nothing wrong with that, it just how some people work.

A lot of the ideas and such I see in many a polyamory manifesto make sense, and ideologically the ideas aren’t terrible, even often worthy and good ideas toward approaching life in general, including romanti-sexual relationships. I’m open to the idea of polyamory as a concept, but life has taught me that I’m just not wired that way; if I fall for a new person, I’m simply no longer interested in the first person romanti-sexually —with one exception, where I managed to briefly fall back in love after the other romance ended.

For an extrovert, I introspect a lot, and I’ve come to the notion that I seem to know myself fairly well for some-one of my age. Might I suddenly find myself in a situation where some sort of polyamorous lifestyle could work for me? Sure, just as much as I just might find myself in love with and sexually attracted to a cisgender woman someday, even though I don’t foresee that happening any time this decade. As a general rule, though, it takes a major upset to one’s life, something that makes one really sit down and re-think not just their ideals, but their whole concept of their self to change that drastically. While I’m not saying “it couldn’t happen” that suddenly one day polyamory and I could work, I am saying that it would take a lot more than “meeting the right people”.

And there is absolutely nothing wrong with only feeling that romanti-sexual love in a serial monogamy format. It simply means that you’re only in love with one person at a time, and that while you may agree with polyamory, it clearly doesn’t agree with you.


1: I’m not saying that there somehow aren’t any monogamists who fit that description, but I’m saying that description is not unique to monogamous relationships.

Hex Me

We all come from Narkissos
And to Him we shall return
Like the sound of a tree
Falling in the woods


What is this bullshit, you might ask?

Legally protected.

That unsound old fool, as far as I’m concerned, has issued a personal challenge, and I accept. Hex me now, I’m waiting.

…also, maybe it’s cos it’s WAY past my bedtime, but I think my parody managed to be immensely deep, there. Take a night off from sleep, re-read it, and then really think about it, if you don’t see it right away.


ETA: You can follow my updates on being Hexed here:
https://twitter.com/#!/HexedByDianics

[begging] I am here to get you laid!

So, in going through a bunch of crap in my room, I’ve found a bunch of surplus condoms I can’t use any more due to latex allergy. Because I hate throwing out otherwise perfectly good items, I’d rather these rubber johnnies go to a good home than in the garbage.

I have two brands: Durex and ONE

Durex is the brand I’ve bought my entire adult life (no matter how much their costume adverts amuse me, I will never buy Trojans; an old friend who was a part of ACT UP during his uni days in the early 1990s has given me some very good reasons not to —reasons I’m having the hardest time sourcing, but he was there at the time, so I trust him), they’re the most popular brand in the Anglosphere and they’re a UK-based brand, but ONE amuse me because of their “designer” foils, and I picked up a bunch with their “pride foils” last year, when I still didn’t realise I was allergic to latex.

I’m selling all of these with the “extra protection” ONE branded tin for $7 plus $3 shipping. The expiration dates vary between March 2013 (three of the Durex) and March 2015 (at least seven of the ONE), so you’d have a minimum of about one year to use them.

I’ll also bless each condom prior to packaging and shipping, which I’m doing just as a complimentary religious service. :-)

First come, first served. I’m selling these as a batch, photo is just included to show off the ONE foils and box. The box looks like it’s aluminium and it can comfortably hold 12 or 13 condoms, 15 or 16 if you squeeze ‘em in (or you can put in ten condoms or fewer and one or two of those little mini-sachets of lube) —great for dorm room, messenger bag, or large purse storage.

Polytheism and Retrofuturism

Retrofuturism is, in essence, a philosophy that has been highly influential in late 20th and early 21st Century art, music, design, and (typically underground) fashion. I’d says its beginnings can be traced to the 1960s, when the first conscious revival of a once-popular movement —Art Deco— took place, though the movement really started to take off in the 1970s. While Isadora Duncan was certainly a prototypical and extreme retrofuturist, her influence, during her time, was limited to dance, so clearly while she can be argued to have scattered some seeds for retrofuturism, the movement did not take root with her. Streamline Moderne design, popular in the 1940s, is sometimes erroneously described as an Art Deco revival, but it is, in actuality, merely a continuation of the movement; where Art Nouveau of the 1890s and 1900s can be described as “organic”, Art Deco can be described as “mineral” in its look and feel, especially its penchant for symmetric geometry — Streamline, on the other hand, is organic lines with an Art Deco sensibility, thus it is not a true revival. But I digress.

In simplest terms, Retrofuturism is taking the best of the past and the best of the present and moulding it with a progressive-mindedness that looks toward the future. Steampunk is retrofuturist. By extension, Diesel- and decopunk are retrofuturist, and Atompunk is retrofuturist. While the Mod subculture was initially a very modern-minded subculture, its deep connections to the Phil Spector/Tamla-Motown sound and a 1960s-influenced aesthetic have assured its evolution into a retrofuturist subculture, albeit not the most conscious retrofuturist subculture, when compared to most others. Roxy Music is a retrofuturist group. As is DEVO. As is Joe Jackson. Jim Henson’s life-long love of puppetry and apparent knowledge of its history, and not to mention showing off that knowledge in his abilities to create quality entertainment intended for an adult audience (yet silly enough that children didn’t need to understand The Muppet Show, for example, in order to enjoy it) is inherently retrofuturist. Guy Maddin is retrofuturist, though he prefers “ultra-conformist”, which, to be honest, is actually best at describing his techniques, which are seldom more evolved than the industry standard of 1933. The work of McDermott & McGough is absolutely retrofuturist with an emphasis on the retro. Electroswing is retrofuturist with an emphasis on the future. Neofolk is a genre that is, at its heart, retrofuturist but in practise, some bands identify more closely with certain flavours of Fascism, which is, at its heart, Traditionalist —but in all honesty (and more knowledge of music than most other people who can wear the “Goth DJ” hat), Leonard Cohen and Nico were among the first musicians to be described as “neofolk” or even “dark folk”, and Johnny Indovina of Human Drama considers much of his music to be some form of “neo-folk”, and it would be hard (at the absolute least) to consider any of those musos to be Fascists or Traditionalists.

The modern pagan and polytheist movements are, too, typically retrofuturist with a few exceptions. Chaos magic seems decidedly modernist with some hints of straight-up futurism. There is also a segment of reconstructionist polytheists that are more concerned with an anti-progressive notion of “the ancients” to the point that it’s easy to call them Traditionalist or even Anti-modernist; retrofuturists, by their nature, tend to avoid such types as we find their non-interest in a living society in favour of an arbitrary point in the ancient past (often long pre-dating even a century or two prior Christianity’s birth, much less its rise to prominence) to be rather silly.

If there’s anything that a vast majority of pagans and polytheists have in common, it’s an interest in re-shaping the present and future with knowledge about the past influencing this form. This is a variant on the two major themes of retrofuturist creativity: The first is the “retrofuture purist” form, which is celebrating the past’s idea of the future. The second is to re-imagine the past as seen with eyes of the present that are, at the very least, mindful of the future (though retrofuturist art tends to emphasise the future). The tendencies of pagans and polytheists to take what is known of the ancient past polytheistic religions and adapt them to not only modern life but a future-mindedness makes this the ultimate retrofuturist religious movement; Gnostics probably come in at a close second place.

While an degree of tradition is important in most pagan and polytheist religions, they are not typically defined by their traditions, but by the cultures they sprang from and the communities they are shared by, which essentially creates a vision of the future.